For History 3.1, an inquiry is a historical investigation where you examine an historical event, person, or movement to understand what happened, why it happened, and why it was significant.
Steps:
Research Proposal (Planning/preparation)
Background research
Creating questions
Research and source collection
Annotating
Reflection/self-assessment
Choose one of the following historical events to base your inquiry on:
Second Wave Feminism (United States), 1960-1980
Anti-Apartheid Movement (South Africa), 1960-1994
The Stolen Generation (Australia), 1910-1970
Parihaka (Aotearoa New Zealand), 1881
Rātana Movement (Aotearoa New Zealand), 1918-1936
Gay Rights Movement (United States), 1969-2015
To get Achieved in this assessment standard, you MUST create a research proposal, this includes:
explains the importance of the topic selected
developed relevant focusing question(s) from preliminary research
specifically identified possible sources through preliminary research
You MUST select sufficient relevant historical evidence making sure it is collected and organised
e.g.
both primary and secondary evidence is selected to enable comprehensive analysis of an historical event or place
organisation of evidence is clear, such as sorted by source type, focusing question, highlighting, etc.
evidence details are recorded accurately (author, title, publisher, city of publication, date of publication, full URL and accession date(s))
For Excellence:
Shown initiative in the gathering and selecting of relevant evidence
e.g. persevering with difficult sources, and/or using evidence from sources which are not readily available.
Click this link
Produced annotated comments by:
identifying the relevance, and assessing the comparative usefulness, of the selected evidence in terms of the focusing question(s) being investigated
identifying different perspectives
cross referencing specific information or ideas between sources to support the analysis of the evidence
assessing the reliability of the evidence and/or source
identifying omissions or inaccuracies in the information.
For Merit & Excellence:
Produced annotated comments that meet the Achieved requirements and:
are analytical and critical
that include assessment of the reliability of selected evidence
Evaluating the research process means to:
explaining the successes and difficulties encountered in conducting the research
explaining how the line of inquiry may have changed as evidence was accumulated,
identifying the issues to consider for future inquiries
For Excellence:
Evaluated the research process comprehensively:
analysing the strength(s) and weakness(es) of the process
analysing how these strength(s) and weakness(es) are likely to impact on the validity of the findings
considering alternative research steps and/or line(s) of inquiry and/or methods, and their implications.
You can present this inquiry in one of two ways:
Online Template
Physical Book
The online template (created and provided by Tch.), will have step by step sections you will need to fill in.
The physical book (provided by Tch.) will mean printing/glueing your sources, and hand-writing your annotations. Your reflection can be done online and printed for the book.
One way is not better than the other, it is personal preference so choose what will be best for you!
Analyse: examine (something) methodically and in detail, typically in order to explain and interpret it
Analytical: relating to or using analysis or logical reasoning
Critical: involving the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement
Examine: inspect (someone or something) thoroughly in order to determine their nature or condition
Explain: make (an idea or situation) clear to someone by describing it in more detail or revealing relevant facts
Identify: establish or indicate who or what (someone or something) is